Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23013 (JHR)

RAVINDRA OJHA @ RABINDRA KUMAR OJHA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4743/2026 · 2026-08-19

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:25056] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4743 of 2026 Ravindra Ojha @ Rabindra Kumar Ojha, age 46 years old, son of Vasudav Ojha, Resident of Village Hajipur Dyara, P.O. and P.S. Mirzachouki, District Sahibganj. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate. For the State : Mr. S.K. Shukla, AP.P. For the Informant : Mr. Agnivesh, Advocate. ------ 05/ 19.08.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mirzachouki P.S. Case No. 18 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 135, 109(1), 303(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has earlier instituted an FIR, being Mirzachouki P.S. Case No. 79 of 2022 against the informant party regarding kidnapping of his minor daughter and in that case, the informant party has gone to jail and after getting bail, they have started disturbing the petitioner and his family members and on the fateful day, the informant has gone to the house of this petitioner and the alleged place of occurrence is also the house of this petitioner and when the informant tried to jump the boundary wall, he has received certain injury. He next submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-11 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State and learned counsel [2026:JHHC:25056] -2- appearing for the informant have jointly opposed the prayer and submit that the allegations are there of making assault upon the informant. On this ground, they submit that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that for kidnapping of the daughter of this petitioner, petitioner has earlier instituted an FIR, being Mirzachouki P.S. Case No. 79 of 2022 against the informant party and further the place of occurrence of the present case is also the house of this petitioner and when the informant tried to jump the boundary wall, he has received certain injury and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned court within four weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty-five thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj, in connection with Mirzachouki P.S. Case No. 18 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-19.08.2026 Amitesh/-