APHC010391022025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL No.881 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-24 [3552] Smt. G. Demudamma ...Appellant Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and another ...Respondents ********** Advocate for appellant : Ms. B. Sofiea representing Ms. M.S.V.S. Sudha Rani Advocate for respondents : Sri T. Deva Deepak Anirudh Yadav representing Sri Chintapalli Srinivas (R-2) CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 20th February 2026 P C : The present Writ Appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 01.05.2025 passed in Writ Petition No.22552 of 2024. 2. The writ petition filed by the appellant herein was disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 – Sri Varaha Lakshminarasimha Swamy Vari Devasthanam, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam District that if the petitioner’s possession of the subject land was unauthorized, she should be heard in the matter before any final orders are passed. The respondents were ordered not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner till such time as appropriate orders came to be passed. 2 3. These directions were issued on the premise, as was urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner before the learned single Judge, that the petitioner was in possession of the property in question which she claimed to have purchased through a valid sale deed executed in her favour on payment of appropriate sale consideration in regard to the parcel of land in plot No.51 admeasuring 240 square yards in Sy.Nos.53/B and 54/C located at Adivivaram Village, Visakhapatnam District. 4. Although learned counsel for the respondents made an effort to suggest that the petitioner was not in possession at all, we find that the judgment and order impugned has not been challenged by the respondents nor any review filed for seeking a review of the judgment and order impugned in the present writ appeal. 5. We feel that the interest of the petitioner stands protected sufficiently and no interference is warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J AMD 3 79 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT APPEAL No.881 of 2025 Dt:20.02.2026 AMD