IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADSH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1308 of 2026 Decided on: 15.09.2026 _______________________________________________________________ Santosh Kumari ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar and Another. ....Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioner : Ms. Anu Minhas, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Petitioner, has invoked the contempt jurisdiction of this Court alleging the non-compliance of the judgment dated 15.05.2026, [Annexure C-1], passed by another Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in CWP No. 7593 of 2026, titled as Santosh Kumari vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., directing the Respondents-Competent to decide the representation, [Annexure P-1, in the said writ petition], within 12 weeks. 2. Heard. 3. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents-State. 4. Upon listing of the case today, Learned State Counsel has furnished a copy of order dated 22.06.2026 [Taken on record], passed by Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, whereby, the representation, [Annexure P-1], as referred in the judgment under reference] stands decided by Respondents/Competent Authority. 5. Since the direction contained in the judgment dated 15.05.2026, [Annexure C-1], stands complied with, as the representation stands decided on 22.06.2026. In these circumstances, the instant petition shall stand closed. Notice of contempt is discharged. 6. Liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek redressal hereinafter, in case, the grievance still survives. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September, 15, 2026 (Anita)