Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23010 (CHH)

JOGENDRA NATH SINGH THAKUR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4576/2026 · 2026-06-23

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25837 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4576 of 2026 1 - Jogendra Nath Singh Thakur S/o Late Jagannath Singh Thakur Aged About 63 Years Retired Deputy Ranger, R/o Raja Para, Palace Road, Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest And Climate Change, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chief Conservator Of Forest Department Of Forest And Climate Change, Aranya Bhawan, Sector- 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Divisional Forest Officer, Sarangarh, Bilaigarh Division District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 4 - The Principal Accountant Office Of Accountant General, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Tanmay Thomas, Advocate For Respondent/State : Ms. Shakshi Bajpai, Advocate For Respondent No.4. : Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 24.06.2026 1. By the present petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.06.24 17:59:43 +0530 2 towards the respondents authorities for payment of withheld retiral dues i.e. GPF, GIS, Leave Encashment, etc payable to the petitioner along with the arrears. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents, by producing a communication dated 23/06/2026 issued by the Divisional Forest Officer, Sarangarh-Bilaigarh to the District Treasury Officer, Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, wherein it has been requested for make payment of retiral dues to the petitioner and along with the said communication, all the requisite documents have also been sent to the District Treasury Officer. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instruction, submits that the amount of retiral dues would be released to the petitioner within a fortnight. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection with regard to the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to approach before the Court, if the grievances still exists. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep