Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23009 (CHH)

JAI SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/5330/2026 · 2026-06-18

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25053 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 5330 of 2026 1 - Jai Singh S/o Late Shivraj Aged About 50 Years, 2 - Shivcharan Singh S/o Bhola Singh Aged About 42 Years, 3 - Chitrangan Singh S/o Bhola Singh Aged About 32 Years All are R/o Village Patna P.S. Ramanujnagar District Surajpur C.G. ... Applicants. Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer P.S. Ramanujnagar District Surajpur C.G. … Non-applicant For Applicants : Shri Abhinav Dubey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Ram Narayan Sahu, Deputy G.A. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Order on Board 19/06/2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, the B.N.S.S.) for grant of regular bail to the applicants who have been arrested in connection with Crime No. 221/2025 registered at Police Station – Ramanuijnagar, Dist. Surajpur (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 296, 351(3), 115(2), 3(5) and 103 (1) of Bhartiya Nyay Samhita, 2023 (for short, the BNS). 2. As per the prosecution’s case, on 23.12.2025, when the informant Maheshwar was present in the field, he heard some quarrel between Digitally signed by ALLENA ANJANI KUMAR Date: 2026.06.19 17:15:37 +0530 2 the accused party and father, mother and the sister of the informant. It is further alleged that due to previous enmity the accused party along with one Bhola abused the father, mother and sister and later on assaulted them with bricks, stick and fists and on account of such assault, family members of the informant sustained injury, however, his father succumbed to the injuries. Based on this, offence under the aforesaid sections has been registered against the present applicants. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have not committed any offence and they were falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused party also suffered grievous injuries in the alleged incident. He also submits that the applicants are in jail since 24.12.2025 & 11.02.206 and that, trial is going on and it may take some time to conclude. On these premises, he prays for the grant of regular bail to the applicants. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the bail application and submitted that the accused party has committed murder of Anand Ram, which is a serious offence and also injured to two other persons and F.I.R. was also lodged immediately after the incident, mentioning therein the names of the present applicants therefore, the applicants do not deserve regular bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the nature and gravity of the offence and taking into account that the trial is going on, I am not inclined to release the applicants on bail. 7. Accordingly, the application filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is 3 rejected. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE PSName