APHC010402902015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37157/2015 Between: 1. M.RAVINDRA NAIK, S/O ANKAL NAIK AGE 29 YEARS, R/O SUGGALI THANDA B.MATTAM MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED REGD OFFICE, G.9, ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG, BANDRA (EAST), MUMBAI-400 051. 2. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED MKTG DIVISION, A.P. STATE OFFICE, # 3-6-436 TO 438 2ND FLOOR, NASPEN HOUSE, HIMAYATHNAGAR HYDERABAD-500 029, REP. BY ITS APPELLATE AUTHORITY & GM TAPSO 3. THE SENIOR AREA MANAGER INDIAN OIL, CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ... ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or wir one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not allotting Godown in pursuant to notification published in Daily News paper dt. 19-12-2011 in favour of the petitioner under Rajiv Gandhi LPG Vitrak (RGGLV) Scheme at Somireddypalle Village, Brahamamgari Mattam Mandal, Kadapa District and proceeding to issue fresh notification is arbitrary, illegal, unjust, unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice and 2 JS, J W.P.No.37157/2015 consequently direct the respondents to issue allotment order in favour of the petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 47836 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay the issuance of fresh notification for allotment of Rajiv Gandhi LPG Vitrak (RGGLV) at Somireddypalle Village, Brahmamgari Maftam Mandal, Y.S.R. District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SHOBA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ASHOK RAM V 2. 3. DOMINIC FERNANDES 3 JS, J W.P.No.37157/2015 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 06.01.2026 rsd 4 JS, J W.P.No.37157/2015 211 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37157/2015 Date: 06.01.2026 rsd