ABINASH YADAV ALIAS AVINASH YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./7605/2026 · 2026-08-13
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23005 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23005 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:24170] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.7605 of 2026
------ Abinash Yadav @ Avinash Yadav aged about 46 years, S/o Shripati Yadav, R/o Ward No. 08, Gorhi Ghat, Godda, P.O. & P.S.-Godda, District-Godda.
... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Indra Bhushan Prasad Sinha, Advocate
Mr. Mritunjay Chaudhary, Advocate.
Mr. Ankur Anand, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated:-13-08-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. No. 141 of 2025 arising out of Godda (T) P.S. Case No. 139 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 400 of 2011 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed dacoity and looted gold bangles from the wife of the informant and fled away by injuring the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that even though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting the petitioner on T.I.P, charge-sheet has been submitted as mentioned in para-11 of this Bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.04.2025 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge V Godda in connection with Godda (T) P.S. Case No. 139 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 400 of 2011 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 13/08/2026 Amar/