Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23004 (JHR)

TABIR ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7625/2026 · 2026-08-14

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:24445 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7625 of 2026 Tabir Ansari, aged about 25 years, S/o Kyum Ansari, R/o Village:- Hethpochra, P.O. Hethpochra, P.S.- Latehar, District-Latehar. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. V.P. Pathak, Advocate : Ms. Manisha Kumari, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Advocate --- 04/14.08.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2024 in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 354 of 2024 relating to S.T. Case No. 214 of 2024, for the alleged offence registered under Section 304B, 498-A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II, Latehar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the bail application of the petitioner was rejected earlier by this Court in B.A. No. 4297 of 2026 vide order dated 10.06.2026. He has submitted that only two witnesses have been examined so far way back on 23.04.2026 who are the informant (brother) and another brother of the deceased. He has submitted that both the witnesses have turned hostile and further witnesses are not being examined. For last 4 dates no witness has turned-up. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner and two close relatives of the deceased including the informant, have turned hostile, the petitioner is 2026:JHHC:24445 2 directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Latehar in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 354 of 2024 relating to S.T. Case No. 214 of 2024 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 14.08.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-17.08.2026