Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2300 (CHH)

BHALERAO PRAKASH BALU v. UNION OF INDIA

WPS/381/2026 · 2026-01-14

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2026:CGHC:2406 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 381 of 2026 1 - Bhalerao Prakash Balu S/o Balu Dagadu Bhalerao Aged About 38 Years Working As Constable/ G.D. Force No. 125254541 And Posted At 207 Cobra Head Quarter At Salboni, P.S. Salboni, District West Medinipur, West Bengal- 721147 And R/o Village Ramnagar Girnare, Post Egatpuri, District Nashik, Maharashtra- 422403. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Union Of India Through Minister Of State Ministry Of Home Affairs Government Of India New Delhi- 110001. 2 - Area Commandant, Team No. 7,8,9/ 207 Cobra Head Quarter At Salboni, P.S. Salboni, District West Medinipur, West Bengal- 721147. 3 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 4 - Director General Of Police Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 5 - Inspector General Of Police Raipur District Raipur C.G. 6 - Collector Gariyaband, District Gariyaband C.G. 7 - Superintendent Of Police Gariyaband, District Gariyaband C.G. 8 - The Commandant, Office At 207 Cobra Head Quarter At Salboni, P.S. Salboni, District West Medinipur, West Bengal- 721147. ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.01.20 18:11:50 +0530 2 / 3 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Lochan Kumar Janghel, Advocate For State : Ms. Apoorva Nigam, Panel lawyer For UOI/Respondent no. 1 : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 15/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 26.11.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the respondent authorities in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider request representation (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner and to grant award (PGM Medal) to the petitioner within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 1.03 Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was posted in village Kulhadighat, Police Station Mainpur, District Gariyaband, as a Constable. He participated in a naksalite operation and in conflict with them has also assassinated several naksal persons at village Kulhadigaht along with other police personal. After completion of said naksal operation, looking to the bravery of the petitioner in the naksalite operation petitioner’s name was included in books of good performance. But the State Government has not considered him for the PGM (Medal). He further submits that petitioner has submitted a 3 / 3 representation before authorities vide Annexure P-2 however, it has not been considered and decided till now, therefore, direction be issued to respondent authorities to consider and take decision on pending representation. 3. Learned counsel for respective respondents submits that as petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking direction to consider and take decision on pending representation, they are having no objection. Though they further submits that as the representation Annexure P-2 is dated 09.12.2025 which does not bear receipt seal or sign, if petitioner submits a fresh representation, it will be considered and decided in accordance with law. 4. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage permitting petitioner to submit a fresh, comprehensive representation before the concerned authority and in the event petitioner submits such representation, it shall be considered and decided by concerned authority in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within an outer limit of three weeks from the date of submission of representation. 5. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza