APHC010402002013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23339/2013 Between: 1. N. RAJASEKHAR, S/O. NAGARJUNA, AGED 21 YEARS, CONTRACT LABOUR, APGENCO., DR. NTTPS, R/O Q.NO.JE 426, SECURITY COLONY, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, (H.T.NO.20100203). ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P.GENCO., VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HR, APGENCO., VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, APGENCO., VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. 4. PITLAM PRAVEEN GOUD H T NO 10600814, C/O. CHIEF ENGINEER, APGENCO, POCHAMPADU, NIZAMABAD R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER C.O. DT. 19-4-17 IN WPMP 29581 OF 13 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner as local candidate of Krishna District and further action of the respondents in not taking the study period of IT1 and 8 to SSC in 2 Krishna District, as highly illegal and also declare the action of respondents in applying the Presidential Order for selection to the post of Junior Plant Attendant and not selecting the petitioner for the post of Junior Plant Attendant in pursuance to the Notification No.01/CGM(HR)/2011 dt.17-10-2011 by considering his case as. local candidate of Krishna District or for selection in other generation stations in accordance with the preferences given by him by declaring the clauses No.4&5 of the above notification, as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.14 & 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Junior Plant Attendant and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 28659 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioner for appointment to the posts of Junior Plant Attendants in pursuance to the Notification No. 01/CGM(HR)/2011 dated 17-10- 2011 as local candidate of Krishna District or in any generation station basing on his merit and preference pending disposal of the writ petition and pass. IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 29581 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to implead the proposed respondent herein as party respondent No.4 in the above writ petition No.23339 of 2013 as well as in the Miscellaneous Petition No.28659 of 2013 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N M KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K ARUNA(SC FOR APGENCO) The Court made the following: 3 Order:- There is no representation for the petitioner today. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner has challenged the appointment of the 4th respondent as Junior Plant Attendant. The 4th respondent is impleaded as a party respondent in the writ petition. 3. It is submitted that the recruitment in pursuance of the notification dated 17.10.2011 is completed and that the petitioner is found ineligible; as such, the respondent authorities have appointed the 4th respondent. 4. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 29.01.2026 PNS