Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22995 (AP)

V SRINIVASA RAO v. SRI SAI PRASAD IAS

CC/3641/2024 · 2026-03-30

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010399842024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3641/2024 Between: 1. V SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. V.RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O.D.NO.9-3-68, KATHULAGUDEM, PITHAPURAM, KAKINADA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND SPL. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522237. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522237. 3. SRI SAGILI SHANMOHAN IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR (IRRIGATION WING) KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4. SRI G SESHAGIRI RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, Y.L DIVISION, PEDDAPURAM, KAKINADA DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to initiate the Contempt proceedings against the respondents and punish them suitably under section 10 to 12 of the 2 Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the order dt.08.11.2023 passed in Writ Petition No.20950 of 2022 by His Lordship the Honble Sri Justice Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B JAYA PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU 2. K M KRISHNA REDDY 3. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3641/2024 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 08.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.20950 of 2022. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 08.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.20950 of 2022and to that effect written instructions are also furnished. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not refute the same. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 31.03.2026 TTPPSS 4 106 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3641/2024 31.03.2026 TTPPSS