APHC010390932021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 904/2021 Between: 1. K VIRUPAKSHAPPA, S/O.LATE.K. THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RETD. ASSISTANT SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE MARKET COMMITTEE, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DIST. R/O. RAYADURGAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI POST, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE MARKETING DEPARTMENT, A.P., CHUTTUGUNTA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF MARKETING, , VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE CHAIRMAN, , AGRICULTURE MARKET COMMITTEE, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DIST, 5. THE SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE MARKET COMMITTEE, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): To call for the records relating to issue of orders of Government in Memo No.53/1/2015-SO (Mktg.II-AGRSECT dated 10-7-2016 and set aside the Page 2 of 3 SRS,J W.P.(AT) No.904 of 2021 same or in alternative declare it as not applicable to service of the Applicant herein and further direct the respondents herein to treat the interregnum period from 30-6-2014 (attaining 58 years) till date of his reinduction into service on 1_1_2016 as on duty for the purpose of pay, pension and allowances with all consequential benefits as he was without pension/pay for the above stated period for no fault on his part Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N KUMAR DEV Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 23.12.2022 and 23.01.2026, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Even today, though the matter is listed for dismissal, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Writ Petition, Transferred from APAT. Hence, this Writ Petition Transferred from APAT is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 30.01.2026 S D P Page 3 of 3 SRS,J W.P.(AT) No.904 of 2021 75 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 904/2021 Date: 30.01.2026 S D P