Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22991 (JHR)

MOHAMMAD SAIF @ LAMBA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6527/2026 · 2026-08-21

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:25352] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6527 of 2026 ------ Mohammad Saif @ Lamba aged about 31 years, S/o Imam Ahmad, R/o- Khan Lane, Ramjam Colony, Kanta Toli, P.O.- GPO, P.S.- Lower Bazar, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand. Present Add: Church Road, Nazir Ali Lane, Sarkari Kuwan, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S. Lower Bazar, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-21-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chutia P.S. Case No. 30 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner snatched away the gold chain of the informant while riding a motorcycle. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and without putting him on T.I. Parade, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner as mentioned in para 10 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.04.2026 as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been remanded in this case in connection with Ranchi Sadar P.S. Case No. 107 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Ranchi in connection with Chutia P.S. Case No. 30 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 21.08.2026 Amar/