SURENDRA GURJAR @ CHHOTURAM GURJAR S/O MUSA RAM GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5590/2026 · 2026-04-13
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2299 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2299 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:15308] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5590/2026 Surendra Gurjar @ Chhoturam Gurjar S/o Musa Ram Gurjar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Mangalpura Tan Jhirana, Police Station Sadar Neemkathana, District Sikar (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Sub-Jail Neem Ka Thana District Sikar). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 13/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 86/2026 registered at Police Station Neem Ka Thana, Sadar, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 126(2), 109(1), 3(5), 111(4) of BNS and Section 27 of Arms Act, 1959.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 15.03.2026; the main allegation of firing is against the co-accused Bunti and is attributable to his personal enmity. No one has sustained any injury. Conclusion of trial may take a long time, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by accused-petitioner and submits that one
[2026:RJ-JP:15308] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5590/2026] criminal antecedent other than the case in hand is registered against the accused-petitioner.
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that petitioner is in custody since 15.03.2026; trial is likely to take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Surendra Gurjar @ Chhoturam Gurjar is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
[2026:RJ-JP:15308] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5590/2026]
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J EKTA/30