Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2299 (KAR)

SRI KALAIAH v. SMT PUTTAMMA

RSA/1248/2022 · 2026-04-01

Pradeep Singh Yerur

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17789 RSA No. 1248 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1248 OF 2022 (DEC) BETWEEN: SRI KALAIAH AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS S/O. SRI CHIKKAIAH R/AT KALENAHALLI KAVALU VILLAGE (KUNKUMADA HOSUR) HALEKOTE HOBLI HOLENARASIPURA TALUK. …APPELLANT (BY SRI SHIVAKUMAR D.A., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: SMT. PUTTAMMA W/O. SRI SAJJEGOWDA @ KARIYAPPA SINCE DEAD BY LRS. RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 1. SRI NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS S/O. SRI SAJJEGOWDA @ KARIYANNA. 2. SRI RAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O. SRI SAJJEGOWDA @KARIYANNA. BOTH ARE RESIDING AT MENAGANAHALLI VILLAGE HALLIMYSORE HOBLI HOLENARSIPURA TALUK. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17789 RSA No. 1248 of 2022 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.05.2022 PASSED IN R.A.NO.44/2020 BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARASIPURA AND DISMISS THE SAID APPEAL AND THEREBY CONFIRM AND UPHOLD THE DISMISSAL OF SUIT DATED 24.11.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.6/2012 BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARASIPURA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. It is observed that, vide order dated 22.08.2025, the appellant was reported to have passed away and time was granted to bring the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on record. However, despite sufficient time having been granted, the legal representatives have not been brought on record. 3. On 06.03.2026, this Court imposed costs and granted two weeks’ time. However, despite the same, needful has not been done, inasmuch as neither have the costs been paid nor have the legal representatives been - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17789 RSA No. 1248 of 2022 brought on record. Therefore, it appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5