Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010391962021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 950/2021 Between:
1. K SUBBA RAO, S/O.VEERRAJU, AGED 58 YEARS, WORKED AS BORE WELL OPERATOR, BOMMURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 533124 R/O.3-362,VENKATAGIRI KONDA, BOMMURU, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THE STATE OF AP REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, VELAGAPUDI, ARNRAVATI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. AP.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTORPR WING, , KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. THE SPECIAL OFFICER, BOMMURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, RAJAHMUNDRY RURAL MANDAI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. THE SECRETARY, , BOMMURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, RAJAHMUNDRY RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): To declare the proceedings issued in efile.No.47711/2017-A5 Dt 7-7- 2017 removing the applicant from service as illegal, unjust, contrary to rules
2
apart from it being violative of principles of natural justice and set aside the same and consequently, direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant as borewell operator with all the consequential benefits Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M SRIKANTH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES IV The Court made the following order:
The petitioner originally filed O.A.No.2162 of 2017 on the file of learned Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, at Hyderabad (for short ‘the Tribunal’) to declare the proceedings issued vide efile.No.47711/2017-A5 dated 07.07.2017, removing the petitioner from service, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. After the abolition of the Tribunal, the O.A. was transferred to High Court and the same is numbered as W.P.(APAT).No.950 of 2021.
3. Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that due to efflux of time, the cause in this writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous.
4. Recording the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 27.02.2026 SNI
3
329 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION (AT) NO: 950 OF 2021
Date: 27.02.2026 SNI