APHC010391672021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 921/2021 Between: 1. P VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, DISTRICT REGISTRAR (RETIRED) ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT R/O H.NO, 18-16-1 0, MANTRI PRAGADAVARI VEEDHI, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE ANDPLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DIRECTOR OF TREASURIES, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D.NO.7-57, SRI ANJANEYA TOWERS, VTPS ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF TREASURIES, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 4. DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, , ANANTAPURAM 5. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, , ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 6. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL A AND E, , ANDHRA PRADESH, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): p. 2 To declare the action of the Respondents in stopping payment of pension to the applicant from 1.9.2016 onwards and insisting to pay back the pension/gratuity which was already - paid to the applicant vide letter No. P2/1/VIS2/SP22/2015-17/217382, dated 18.52017 and other letter No. P2/1IV1S2/SP22120 15-17/219455, dated 08.06.2017 issued by the 6th Respondent and Lr.No.E/93120 15, dated 16-6-2017 issued by the 5th Respondent as wholly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of principles of natural Justice and consequently declare that the applicant is entitled to receive pension from 1.9.2016 onwards and continue to receive the same and other pensionary Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KARUPOLU NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ::ORDER :: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (A.T.) does not survive and the writ petition (A.T.) has become infrucutous. 2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition (A.T.) is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 30.01.2026 IKN p. 3 198 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION (A.T.) NO: 921 of 2021 Date: 30.01.2026 IKN