APHC010392652022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between: 1. A.VENUGOPAL, S/O LATE A. LAKSHMAIAH, AGED AB YEARS, 0CC. CULTIVATION AND BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 17 JAVILI VEEDHI, PALAMANER TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 1. A SARASWATHI, W/O. LATE ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO. 11 RADHA BUNGALOW, PALAMANER TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5876 OF 2022 A.VENUGOPAL, S/O LATE A. LAKSHMAIAH, AGED AB YEARS, 0CC. CULTIVATION AND BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 17 JAVILI VEEDHI, PALAMANER TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND A SARASWATHI, W/O. LATE A. RAVEESVVAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO. 11 RADHA BUNGALOW, PALAMANER TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3327] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY A.VENUGOPAL, S/O LATE A. LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 0CC. CULTIVATION AND BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 17-165/1, JAVILI VEEDHI, PALAMANER TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED A. RAVEESVVAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO. 11-570-7-3, RADHA BUNGALOW, PALAMANER TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT T/COMPLAINANT(S): The Court made the following Order : This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/A.2 seeking to quash the proceedings in S.C.No.313 of 2022 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Palamaner. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required to be passed in this Criminal Petition and the matter has become in fructuous. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as in fructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ K.SREENIVASA REDDY, J Date: 23.03.2026 KK