Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22975 (AP)

Y VENKATARAMA REDDY v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP(AT)/931/2021 · 2026-01-22

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010391772021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 931/2021 Between: 1. Y VENKATARAMA REDDY, S/O. LATE Y. LAXMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. DEPUTY RANGE OFFICER, SOCIAL FORESTRY BANAGANAPALLI SECTION, SOCIAL FORESTRY DIVISION, KUMOOL, KUMOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, ENVIRONMENT, FORESTS, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, (HEAD OF FOREST FORCE), VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, KURNOOL CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, (PRESENTLY WL), NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 518 001. 5. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, SOCIAL FORESTRY DIVISION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): p. 2 SRS,J W.P.(A.T.) No.931 of 2021 to call for the records relating to and connected with the impugned proceedings in Rc. No. 260/201O-M3 dated J 9-4-20 14 issued by the 3rd respondent and the appellate rejection order in Proc.No.10079/20 J 51 A and DC-I Dated 02-06-2017 issued by the 2nd respondent in respect of the allegations pertains to the year 1989 and set aside the same by declaring as selective, illegal arbitrary, vindictive, unduly delayed, violative of G.O.Ms.No. 679 General Administration (Services-C) Dept., dated 1-11-2008, Settled Legal Position, apart from orders in OA No. 8568 of 2013 dated 24-2-2014 and Articles 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G VENKATA KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ::ORDER :: The petitioner originally filed O.A.No.2042 of 2017 on the file of learned Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, at Hyderabad (for short ‘the Tribunal’) to call for records relating to the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.260/2010-M3 dated 19.04.2014 issued by respondent No.3 and the rejection order passed by respondent No.2 vide Proc. No.10079/2015/A & DC-1 dated 02.06.2017, in respect of allegations pertaining to the year, 1989 and set aside the same, declaring as illegal and arbitrary. 2. After abolition of the Tribunal, O.A.2042 of 2017 was transmitted to the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati and the same is numbered as W.P.(A.T.) No.931 of 2021. Page 3 of 4 SRS,J W.P.(A.T.) No.931 of 2021 3. Today when the matter is taken up, Sri G. Venkata Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through online and submitted that the sole petitioner died, pending the proceedings and his legal representatives are not showing any interest to prosecute the case. 4. Given the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as abated. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 23.01.2026 IKN p. 4 SRS,J W.P.(A.T.) No.931 of 2021 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION (A.T.) NO: 931 of 2021 Date: 23.01.2026 IKN