APHC010391952021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 949/2021 Between: 1. B RAMANA, S/O DEVUDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,WORKED AS SWEEPER, PIDIMGOYYA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, RAJAHMUNDRY RURAL MANDAI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, RLO.3- 1 59.KAVALAGOYYA(V), PIDIMGOYYA POST, RAJAHMUNDRY RURAL MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATIGUNTUR DISTRICT,AP. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTORPR WING, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE SPECIAL OFFICER, PIDIMGOYYA GRAM PANCHAYAT, RAJAHMUNDRY RURAL MANDAI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE SECRETARY, PIDIRNGOYYA GRAM PANCHAYAT, RAJAHMUNDRY RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): To declare the proceedings issued in efile.No.47711/2017-A5 Dt.7-7- 2017 reverting the applicant to his original post of NMR sweeper as illegal, 2 unjust, contrary to rules apart from it being violative of principles of natural justice and set aside the same and consequently, direct the respondents to release the retiral benefits viz.,Pension, Group Insurance, PF, Gratuity and other benefits with interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum with all the consequential benefits Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RAGHAVENDRA VENKATESH ( SC FOR VSU NLR ) Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES IV The Court made the following order: The above writ petition was filed to declare the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the proceedings vide efile.No.47711/2017-A5 dated 07.07.2017, reverting the petitioner to his original post of NMR Sweeper, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 13.01.2026, the matter was directed to be listed on 13.02.2026, under the caption “for dismissal”. Even on 13.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. To give one more opportunity, the matter was directed to be listed today. 3. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 4. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 20.02.2026 SNI 3 143 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION (AT) NO:949/2021 Dated: 20.02.2026 SNI