APHC010398552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1961/2025 Between: 1. ARABOLU GEETHA @ THIRUPATHAMMA,, W/O. A. RAVINDRA KUMAR, AGED 45 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, H.NO. 10-1103 AND 10- 1104, VIDYA NAGAR, NANDIKOTKUR, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. YERRABHAM KAVITHA, W/o. Yerabham Prabhakar Reddy, aged 44 years, Hindu, Real Estate Business, R/o, H.No. 2-63, Chowtkur Village, Midthur Mandal, Nandyal District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the Order dated 25-6-2025 passed in LA. No. 279 of 2024 in O.S. No. 3 of 2022 On the file of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nandikotkur, and allow the LA. No. 279 of 2024 in O.S. No. 3 of 2022 by providing police aid through S.H.O Nandikotkur, to the petitioner to take House hold articles, Beeruva, Gold, Cash and original documents which was in the Beeruva which was lying in front of Petitioners suit schedule house and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to directing the S.H.O. Nandikotkur Police Station, to give police aid to the petitioner to take House hold artieles, Beeruva, Gold, Cash and 2 original documents which was in the Beeruva which was lying in front of Petitioner’s suit schedule house pending disposal of the C.R.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BUDIGE BHOJA RAAM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This Civil Revision Petition was filed against the order in I.A.No.279 of 2024 in O.S.No.3 of 2022, on the file of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nandikotkur, dated 25.06.2025. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit and filed the above said I.A. before the learned trial court to provide police aid to take her household articles like Beeruva, Gold, Cash and original documents lying in the Beeruva, which are lying in front of the suit schedule house. The respondent herein is the defendant in the said suit and the respondent in the said I.A., before the learned trial court. 4. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that initially the petitioner has to establish that there is a Beeruva lying outside the suit schedule house, in that said household articles like Gold, Cash, original documents are lying and on consideration of the merits, the Court should have passed the order to that affect and for execution of the same, she has to file an application for police aid. But in this case, she straight away filed a petition before the learned trial court as stated above, seeking police aid to bring back the Beeruva along with the articles inside as claimed, to the suit schedule house. Upon consideration of the said I.A., on merits, the learned trial court rightly dismissed the same. 4 5. In reply, the leaned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to file fresh application, for the relief sought before the said court. 6. Considering the totality of circumstances, the nature of the relief sought and the submissions of both the learned counsels, this Court deems it fit to permit the petitioner to make appropriate applications before the learned trial court afresh and upon consideration of the same on merits, by hearing all the parties concerned, including the petitioner and the respondent, giving due opportunity, appropriate orders shall be passed by the learned trial court uninfluenced by the earlier order passed by it dated 25.06.2025, which is challenged in this Civil Revision Petition for the above said relief. For the said purpose, the said order of the learned trial court dated 25.06.2025 is hereby set aside to consider afresh as directed above. 7. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 06.02.2026 SCH 5 373 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN C.R.P.No.1961 of 2025 Date: 06.02.2026 SCH