Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22957 (JHR)

BABLU YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4702/2026 · 2026-08-20

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:25149 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4702 of 2026 ------ 1. Bablu Yadav, aged about 35 years, son of Lukhur Yadav 2. Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Yadav, aged about 21 Years, son of Ram Rekha Yadav Both resident of Village Lalgara, P.O. and P.S. Bardiha, District Garhwa, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Vinay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. ------ 02/20.08.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bardiha P.S. Case No. 27 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 329(3), 117(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Garhwa. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and the informant are agnates and the altercation took place while plucking of mango from the tree. He next submits that there are general and omnibus allegation and there are case and counter case and first case has been lodged by the petitioners’ side being Bardiha P.S. Case No.26 of 2026. He also submits that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 9 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of assault and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. On perusal of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons and the petitioners and the informant are agnates and it is not clear from the FIR pursuant to whose assault injury has been received and the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 9 of the petition and the altercation took place with regard to dispute of plucking of mango from the tree, in the 2026:JHHC:25149 attending facts and circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Garhwa, in connection with Bardiha P.S. Case No. 27 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 20.08.2026 Anit Uploaded 21.08.2026