Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22955 (HP)

DULO RAM v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./682/2026 · 2026-09-16

Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.682 of 2026 Decided on: 16.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Dulo Ram ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amit Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 5-State. Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.6. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj , Judge (Oral) The petitioner is seeking implementation of the judgment dated 31.12.2025 passed in CWP No.20287 of 2025, titled, Dulo Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. As per the judgment passed by this Court, a direction was given to the respondents to ensure that arrears of pension as well as gratuity in terms of Pension Payment Order No.1125218005 dated 23.12.2025, thereby authorizing pension to the tune of Rs.12,450/- per month 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 w.e.f. 01.07.2017 along with arrears, are released expeditiously, preferably, within two months, failing which the petitioner would be entitled to interest @ 6% from the date amount ordered to be released fell due. 2. As per reply filed by respondents No.1 to 4, the petitioner had deposited an amount of Rs.1,10,714/- and Rs.44,125/- on 18.04.2026 (Annexure R-I). After depositing the amount, the petitioner has been released the arrears of pension. 3. The claim of the petitioner now is that since he was not paid the amount of pension within two months as per the judgment sought to be executed, the respondents have to pay the interest @6% from the date the amount was fell due. Once the petitioner had not deposited the amount of NPS share, he is not entitled to interest and as such, the respondents have not flouted the judgment sought to be executed. Had the petitioner deposited the amount of NPS share before expiry of two months of period, he was entitled to the interest, as directed to be paid by the Court while disposing of the writ petition on 31.12.2025. 4. In view of the above, since the respondents have released the arrears of pension to the petitioner after 3 depositing the share of NPS by him, he is not entitled for any interest and the judgment stands fully complied with. 5. Resultantly, the execution petition is disposed of as having been fully satisfied. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 16 th September , 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge