Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22953 (JHR)

MD. RIZWAN SIDDIQUI ALIAS RIZWAN SIDDIQUI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7632/2026 · 2026-08-14

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:24479] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7632 of 2026 ------ Md. Rizwan Siddiqui @ Rizwan Siddiqui, aged about 34 Years, Son of Wozair Siddiqui, Resident of Near Oxford School, Mugma, Brindabanpur, Kapasara, P.O. & P.S. – Mugma, District – Dhanbad. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Rishav Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-14-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chirkunda P.S. Case No. 121 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 111(3), 308(3), 308(4), 62, 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 25(6), 26(2), 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being a member of an organized gang of criminals, was in illegal possession of arms and ammunitions in an organized manner. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner led to recovery of two country-made pistols, one magazine and 33 live cartridges of different bores from the premises of Gayasuddin Ansari. It is also submitted that there is no victim in the case except in one case in which the petitioner was remanded as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application after his arrest in this case, the petitioner is not involved in any other case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.06.2026 as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Chirkunda P.S. Case No. 121 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 14.08.2026 Saroj/