2026:JHHC:24643 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 219 of 2026 ------- 1. Mahabir Sahu, aged about 71 years, S/o Gayaji Sahu, R/o- Vill Garh Husir, P.O. & P.S.- Hosir, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. Ram Das Sahu @ Bhim Sahu, aged about 38 years, S/o Mahabir Sahu, R/o Vill Garh Husir, P.O.&P.S. Hosir, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Naresh Kumar Sahu, aged about 37 years, S/o Mahabir Sahu, R/o Vill Garh Husir, P.O.&P.S. Hosir, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Pawan Kumar Sahu, aged about 34 years, S/o Mahabir Sahu, R/o Vill Garh Husir, P.O.&P.S. Hosir, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Raj Kumar Sahu @ Raju Sahu @ Charku, aged about 39 years, S/o Late Tapeshwar Sahu, R/o Vill Garh Husir, P.O.&P.S. Hosir, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6. Ram Surat Sahu @ Suresh Sahu, aged about 51 years, S/o Laghu Sahu, R/o Bahadur Tola, Hochar, P.O. & P.S. Hosir, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 7. Aniket Kumar Sahu @ Surendra Sahu, aged about 42 years, S/o Dubeshwar Sahu, R/o Bahadur Tola, Hochar, P.O.&P.S. Hosir, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand 8. Binod Kumar Sahu, aged about 42 years, S/o Dubeshwar Sahu, R/o Bahadur Tola, Hochar, P.O.&P.S. Hosir, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 9. Vicky Kumar Sahu, aged about 22 years, S/o Jaleshwar Sahu, R/o Vill Garh Husir, P.O.&P.S. Hosir, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... Appellant(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Sunita Devi, W/o Ramesh Munda, R/o Vill-Hochar, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi, Jharkhand … Respondent(s). With Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 462 of 2026 Vijay Sahu @ Vijay Kumar Sahu @ Vijay Kumar, aged about 35 years, Son of Shri Naresh Sahu, R/o Gali No.11, Bahadur Tola, Hochar, P.O. Husir, P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) .... Appellant(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Sunita Devi, W/o Ramesh Munda, R/o Vill-Hochar, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) … Respondent(s). ------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ------ For the Appellant(s) : Mrs. Vani Kumari, Advocate [In Cr. A. (SJ) No.219 of 2026] Mr. Bhaskar Trivedi, Advocate Ms. Shipra Sonam, Advocate Mr. Bipin Bihari, Advocate [In Cr. A. (SJ) No.462 of 2026] For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl. PP [In both cases] 2026:JHHC:24643 For the Resp. No.2 : Mr. Navin Kumar, Advocate [In Cr. A. (SJ) No.219 of 2026] Mr. Suraj Verma, Advocate [In Cr. A. (SJ) No.462 of 2026] ------ 07/ 17.08.2026: After some argument, learned counsel for the appellants, on instruction, seek permission to withdraw these Criminal Appeals. 2. Learned counsel for the other sides have no objection. 3. Permission accorded. 4. Accordingly, both Criminal Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Pending Interlocutory Application, if any, also disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 17th August, 2026 Madhav/- Uploaded on:18/08/2026 Cr. A. (SJ) No.219 of 2026 & Cr. A. (SJ) No.462 of 2026