1 APHC010398432015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32123/2015 Between: 1. CH. RAMA RAO, VISAKHAPATNAM, S/O.SURYA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC: ASST. MANAGER, (HSWCOOP, TETC SOCIETY LTD)., R/O.SRI SAI CLINIC, BUCHIRAJUPLAEM, NAD KOTHA RAOD, VISAKHAPATNAM-27. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECRETARY COOP DEPT HYD 4 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES), SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. HINDUSTAN SHIPYARD WORKERS COOPERATIVE THRIFT AND, CREDIT SOCIETY LTD REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, P V NAGESHWAR RAO, GANDHIGRAM, VISAKHAPATNAM-05, 3. THE DY REGISTRAR/ DIVISIONAL COOPETATIVE OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM-16. 4. THE JOINT REGISTRAR/DIST COOPERATIVE OFFICER VISAKHAPATNAM, - 5. THE ASST REGISTRAR, SUB DIVISON, DIVISIONAL CO-OPERATIVE OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order/direction or any appropriate writ, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the petitioner under suspension, without paying subsistence allowance, is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the Rule-21E of the Special Byelaws of the Society and further declare that the action of the Officer denying the Legal assistance to the petitioner on flimsy grounds is illegal arbitrary totally non-application of mind and consequently, set aside the same in the interest of justice and pass orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WVMP 4151 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the Interim Order granted in WP No.32123 of 2015 dt.01.10.2015 and grant no relief to the Writ Petitioner. IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 41512 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the difference of subsistence of allowance i.e., 2/3 of substantial pay and allowances as per the service byelaws of the society in the interest of justice and pass orders. IA NO: 3 OF 2015(WPMP 41513 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service by suspending the order Dt.17-09-2014 in the interest of justice and pass orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH. RAMA RAO, VISAKHAPATNAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2. . 3. W.V.B. SHRAVAN. 4. K UDAYA SRI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32123 of 2015 ORDER:- The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer: “…..to issue an order/direction or any appropriate writ, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the petitioner under suspension, without paying subsistence allowance, is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the Rule-21E of the Special Byelaws of the Society and further declare that the action of the Officer denying the Legal assistance to the petitioner on flimsy grounds is illegal arbitrary totally non-application of mind and consequently, set aside the same in the interest of justice and pass...” 2. On 13.03.2026 this Court passed the following order; “It is submitted that Sri P.Raja Sekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner has given up his Vakalath on 11.07.2016. To that effect, a memo was also filed vide USR No.19932 way back on July, 2016 itself. Hence, Registry is directed to print the petitioner’s name/Ch.Ramarao in the place of learned counsel for the petitioner in the cause list. List the matter after one week.” 3. Consequently, today matter listed for dismissal by noting the petitioner’s name in the cause list in the place of the counsel for the petitioner. Registry is also called the petitioner’s name thrice, but no representation for the petitioner. 4 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 23.03.2026 RMR 5 53 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32123 of 2015 23.03.2026 W RMR