Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22944 (KAR)

SRI ANAND M v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/11769/2026 · 2026-06-22

B M Shyam Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30726 WP No. 11769 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11769 OF 2026 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SRI ANAND M S/MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT 186, NAYAKARA BEEDI, GANESHA TEMPLE ROAD, THOMAS TOWN POST KACHERKANAHALLI BENGALURU 560084. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PARAMESHWARA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRL. SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-01. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560002. Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30726 WP No. 11769 of 2026 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BBMP WARD NO. 29 O/AT NO. WARD NO. 29, BBMP WARD OFFICE KACHARKANAHALLI, BENGALURU 560043. 4. N. THYAGARAJAN S/O LATE NATRAJAN AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/AT NO. 10, BUDHA ROAD, JAI BHARAT NAGAR, BENGALURU 560033. 5. SUGANTH KUMAR THIYAGARAJAN S/O THYAGARAJAN N. AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT NO. 10, BUDHA ROAD, JAI BHARAT NAGAR, BENGALURU 560033. 6. M/S SOWPARNIKA VENTURES A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS HAVING OFFICE AT NO.49, NORTH EAST PLATINUM. KRISHNA REDDY LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BENGALURU-560016. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA., AGA FOR R1; SRI. BATHE GOWDA K.V.,ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO- - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30726 WP No. 11769 of 2026 DIRECTING THE R3 TO TAKE APPROPRIATE TIMELY ACTION AGAINST THE R4 AND 5 BY CONSIDERING THE COMPLAINT/ REPRESENTATION DATED 12.02.2026 VIDE ANNX-G; DIRECTING THE R1 TO 3 TO FORTHWITH TAKE ACTION UNDER SECTION 321 AND 356 OF THE KARNATAKA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS ACT 1976 AGAINST THE ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION CARRIED OUT BY R4 TO 6 AND DIRECT R1 TO 3 TO INITIATE DEMOLITION PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION MADE IN VIOLATION OF THE SANCTIONED PLAN. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The petitioner has invoked this Court's jurisdiction for direction to the Officers of the Greater Bengaluru Authority to take action against the alleged illegal construction by the private respondents. Presently, a memo is filed which reads as under: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30726 WP No. 11769 of 2026 “The Petitioner most respectfully submits that subsequent to the filing of the above Writ Petition, certain developments have taken place and the petitioner has been advised to pursue appropriate remedies before the competent authority. In view of the same, the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the above writ petition any further. Wherefore, the petitioner humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above writ petition with liberty to pursue such other remedies as may be available to him in law, in the interest of justice and equity.” The circumstances why liberty must be reserved is not brought forth. Hence, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn without reserving liberty. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE AN/-