Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22944 (HP)

MEENA KUMARI NEGI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/15976/2026 · 2026-09-15

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15938 of 2026 alongwith connected matters Decided on: 15th September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No.15938 of 2026 Sharwan Jeet …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No.15976 of 2026 Meena Kumari Negi and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CWP No.15993 of 2026 Sudesh Kumari …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Aman Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioners seek applicability of Inder Singh Thakur & Ors. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioners have not preferred any representation for the redressal of their grievances raised in the writ petition. 3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring a representation(s) within two weeks from today. In case such a representation(s) is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 15, 2026 Judge Mukesh 2 CWP No.4830 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matter on 07.04.2025