( 2026:JHHC:25371 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7877 of 2026 ------ Hiralal Kumar @ Hiralal, aged about 22 years, son of Sundar Lal Saw, resident of Village-:Parsotiya, P.O. & P.S.-Ramgarh, Dist.-Ramgarh (Jharkhand) … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jageshwar Mahto, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Mohua Palit, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 21.08.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No.126 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 111(2) (b)/ 111(3)/ 111(4)/ 317(5)/ 308(3)/308(4)/61(2) (a) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Sections 25(1-B) (a)/25(6)/26/35 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is a member of Rahul Dubey gang and was engaged in firing on the engineer working in Ultratech Cement plant as they were not ready to pay the ransom. It is further alleged that the co-accused-Ahtesham Ansari and Durlabh were deployed for target firing upon the engineer and the allegation of firing is upon Ahtesham Ansari causing injuries to guard of Ultratech Cement company and also lobbing bombs. There is further allegation against Nepali @ Deepak Karmali and Vishal Kumar of firing and planting bombs at Osam Dairy plant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the allegation against the petitioner is of riding a bike given and leading to recovery of the bike without any registration number. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.09 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.05.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 10 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Ramgarh, in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No.126 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 21.08.2026 Gunjan-