Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22932 (AP)

P V SUBBA RAO v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP(AT)/943/2021 · 2026-02-12

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010391892021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 943/2021 Between: 1. P V SUBBA RAO, S/O.RAMA RAO, AGED 57 YEARS, DY.DVEO, O/O.THE DISTRICT VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI ANDKRISHNA DISTRICT @ ELURU. W.G.DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY TS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION (IE.1 ) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AMARAVATHI. VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, , STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 4TH LANE, LAXMIPURAM, GUNTUR-2. ...RESPONDENT(S): To call for records relating to proceedings bearing Rc.No.Admn.II- 2/199/2001, dated 29-05-2004 of the 2nd Respondent and setaside the same as without jurisdiction, illegal, arbitrary and violative Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently declare that the applicant is entitled to have retrospective promotion with effect from 18-10-1985 as Junior Lecturer in O.A.S. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone delay of 11 years 7 months 17 days in filing the OA p. 2 against the order of the 2nd respondent bearing Rc.No.Admn.II-2/199/2001 dated 29-5-2004 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RAMA SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following ORDER: Sri Bharat Shah, learned counsel representing Sri K. Rama Subba Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, appeared through virtual mode and would submit that the cause in the writ petition (AT) does not survive and the writ petition (AT) has become infrucutous. 2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition (AT) is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 13.02.2026 TVN p. 3 93 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 943/2021 Date: 13.02.2026 TVN