NEELAM DEVI AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
EX.P./1183/2026 · 2026-09-14
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22931 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22931 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1183 of 2026 Decided on: 14.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Neelam Devi and another
...Petitioners Versus State of HP and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a copy of communication dated 03.08.2026 and office order dated 18.03.2026, passed by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla- 171001, which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order dated 18.03.2026 reveals that the case of the petitioners has been examined and they are allowed higher pay scale in the concerned level of pay matrix after completion of two years regular service, subject to the final outcome of LPA filed by the State in Mohit Sharma case. The DDOs concerned have 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 been directed to fix the pay of the petitioners and release the arrears.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though the office order dated 18.03.2026 has been passed by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, but the arrears have not been paid to the petitioners.
4. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 12.12.2025, passed in CWP No.19504 of 2025, titled, Neelam Devi and Anr vs. State of H.P. & Ors, has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and the same is closed. However, it is made clear that in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioners, within eight weeks from today, in terms of the directions given by this Court in the aforementioned
judgment, they shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
5. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand
disposed of. 14 th September
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge