Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2293 (KAR)

SHRI K H ANJANA MURTHY v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/6741/2025 · 2026-04-01

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18084 WP No. 6741 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 6741 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI K H ANJANA MURTHY S/O LATE HANUMANTHAIAH ALIAS HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/A NO. 710, 10TH MAIN, VINAYAKA LAYOUT, NAGARABHAVI II STAGE, BENGALURU- 560 072. 2. SHRI. RADHAKRISHNA, S/O PUTTASWAMY GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/A NO. 23/A, 1ST MAIN, 5TH CROSS, N.G.E.F LAYOUT, NAGARABHAVI II STAGE, BENGALURU- 560 072. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V B SHIVA KUMAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHANNAPATNA TOWN POLICE STATION, REP BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING, Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18084 WP No. 6741 of 2025 BENGALURU- 560 001. 2. SHRI. H.M. BORE GOWDA, S/O MARIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/A NO. 1035, JNANABHARATHI LAYOUT, II BLOCK, MARIYAPPANAPALYA, BENGALURU- 560056 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOWMYA R, HCGP FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE FOLLOWINGPROCEEDINGS IN CC NO. 2828/2022 BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHANNAPATTANA ARISING OUT OF CRIME NO.0083/2021 DTD 19.11.2021 REGISTERED BY THE CHANNAPATTANA TOWN CIRCLE POLICE STATION, CHANNAPATTANA UNDER SECTION 464,465,468,471,120B,420 AND 34 OF ICP PRODUCED AS ANNX-A., AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18084 WP No. 6741 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader on instructions would submit that the charges have been framed and the petition would not be entertainable at this juncture. 2. In the light of the charges being framed, the entertainment of the petition will run foul of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of MINAKSHI BALA V. SUDHIR KUMAR1. 3. Reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail of such remedy, as is available in law, the petition stands disposed. SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 228 1 (1994) 4 SCC 142