Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010387772021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1803/2021 Between:
1. D.SUBBAMMA, W/O SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O LAKSHMI BALAJI NAGAR VILLAGE, REKULAKUNTA PANCHAYAT, BRAHMAMGARI MATTAM MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. KETAN GARG, WOKING AS SUB COLLECTOR, RAJAMPETA SUB DIVISION, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
2. SRI M LAKSHMI NARAYANA, WORKING AS TAHSILDAR, BRAHMAMGARI MATAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the respondents/contemnors herein under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for wilfully, wantonly and disobediently not implementing the Interim Order dated 21.09.2020 in W.P.No.16821 of 2020 passed by His Lordship's RAKESH KUMAR Garu and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DODDAKA HARSHA VARDHAN Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. P SUBASH The Court made the following:
ORDER:
1. This Contempt Case is filed alleging violation of the interim order dated 21.09.2020 passed by this Court in W.P. No.16821 of 2020, whereby the parties were directed to maintain status quo. After issuance of notice, the contemnors filed their response specifically stating that they have not interfered in the matter.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on fresh instructions, conceded the same in view of the above statement.
3. In view of the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
_____________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date : 22.01.2026 RMD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
C.C. No.1803 of 2021
Date : 22.01.2026 RMD