Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Rai @ Amit Kumar Ray v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./41905/2026 · 2026-06-29
Ashok Kumar Pandey
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22926 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22926 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41905 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2026 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Rai @ Amit Kumar Ray S/O Surendra Rai @ Surendra Ray R/O Village- Salimapur, P.S.- Marhowrah, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No.252 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 305 & 317(5) of the BNS.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has taken away tractor of the informant and was caught red-handed with the tractor.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that actually the petitioner was working with the informant. The petitioner has been framed in this case as he demanded the wages which was due with the informant. It has further been submitted that the tractor was not seized by the police rather it was seized by the locals. It has further been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41905 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since
20.03.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. It has been submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned C.J.M., Saran, Chapra in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No.252 of 2026.
durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T