1 2026:CGHC:24786 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 662 of 2026 1 - Ku. Amrit Kaur D/o Late Harmeet Singh Aged About 19 Years R/o New Santi Nagar Gorkha Colony P.S. Civil Line Raipur C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Amar Pal Singh Broka S/o Late Mahendra Singh Aged About 55 Years Broka , R/o D-12, Phcl Dream Home Apollo Hospital, Pal Smriti Nagar, Junwani Road Bhilai Durg C.G. 2 - Sukhbir Singh Broka S/o Late Mahendra Singh Aged About 50 Years R/o Behind Dhanwantri Hospital Agrasen Chowk Nehru Nagar Bhilai Durg C.G. 3 - Ranjeet Singh Broka S/o Mahendra Singh Broka Aged About 47 Years R/o No. 3 To 6 Main Road Near Pushpa Hospital Dalli Rajhara District Balod C.G. 4 - Tajendar @ Titu Broka S/o Late Mahendra Singh Broka Aged About 63 Years R/o Main Road Near Pushpa Hospital Dalli Rajhara District Balod C.G. 5 - Sardar Jasbir Singh Broka S/o Late Mahendra Singh Broka Aged 2 About 55 Years Main Road Near Pushpa Hospital Dalli Rajhara District Balod C.G. 6 - Rawdeep Singh Broka S/o Late Kukku Broka Aged About 30 Years Main Road Near Pushpa Hospital Dalli Rajhara District Balod C.G. 7 - Banti Broka S/o Mahendra Singh Broka (Dead) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akash Mishra, Advocate For Respondent(s) : None present (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravimdra Kumar Agrawal) Order on Board 18/06/2026 Present is a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “1. The Court may kindly be pleased to pass appropriate writ(s)/order(s) and direct the learned trial court to conclude the execution proceedings pending before it in Execution Case No. 13/2024 titled “Ku. Amrit Kaur Vs.Amar Pal Singh Broka and Others” within a limited time frame of one month in the interest of justice. 2. Any other relief/direction that the Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been diligently pursuing before the learned Family Court, Raipur since 22.10.2024 for enforcement of the judgment and decree dated 3 29.07.2024 passed by the Second Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur in Civil Suit No. 28/2017. It is contended that despite the lapse of considerable time, the decree has yet to attain finality and, therefore, a direction may be issued to the learned Family Court to expedite the execution proceedings and conclude the same within a time-bound schedule. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record. 4. A perusal of the order-sheets of the learned trial court annexed with the petition, particularly Annexure-P/1, reveals that although the execution proceedings have remained pending since 22.10.2024, the learned trial Court has been actively taking steps for enforcement of the decree. The order-sheets dated 30.07.2025, 29.10.2025, 13.02.2026 and 08.04.2026 demonstrate that attachment warrants have been issued against the judgment-debtors with a view to secure execution of the decree. 5. It further transpires from the record that on 08.04.2026, an application preferred by the respondents seeking stay of the execution proceedings came to be rejected by the learned Family Court and permission for dasti service of the attachment warrant was granted in favour of the decree-holder/petitioner. Thus, the material placed on record unmistakably indicates that the learned Family Court is proceeding with the execution case in accordance with law and is taking effective coercive measures for implementation of the decree 4 dated 29.07.2024. Since the executing court is already seized of the matter and is actively pursuing the execution proceedings, this Court does not find any exceptional circumstance warranting issuance of a mandamus directing conclusion of the execution proceedings within a stipulated time-frame. 6. Consequently, finding no merit in the present writ petition, the same deserves to be and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2026.06.23 13:47:50 +0530