1 2026:CGHC:2423 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 397 of 2026 1 - Rajendra Singh Shymale S/o Shri Mahaprasad, Aged About 38 Years Working As Lecturer (Lb) And Posted At Govt. Higher School Tungwa, Block Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) And Attached At Govt. High School Kesari, Block Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) And R/o Village Chapota, Tahsil Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj C.G. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of School Education Atal Nagar, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralay Raipur District Raipur C.G. 2 - Director Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3 - Divisional Joint Director, Education Division Sarguja Place Ambikapur, District Sarguja C.G. 4 - District Education Officer, District Balrampur Ramanujganj C.G. 5 - Block Education Officer, Block Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj C.G. 6 - Principal, Govt. Higher School Tungwa, Block Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj C.G. 7 - Principal, Govt. High School Kesari, Block Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj C.G. --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Dashrath Kushwaha, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 15/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that considering the arrest of the petitioner in criminal case, petitioner was suspended. Vide order dated 01.04.2024, petitioner was released on bail within short period and thereafter, submitted representation for re-considering the order of suspension of petitioner, however, no order has been passed on the said application, therefore, a direction be issued to respondents to take decision on the application/representation submitted by petitioner for reconsideration of suspension of petitioner. 2. Learned State counsel submits that in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, he is having no objection. He however, submits that in the representation submitted by petitioner, there is no mention for reviewing the order of suspension. 3. On due consideration on the submission of learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit fresh representation for reviewing the order of suspension of petitioner and if such representation is submitted, the concerned authorities shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of three weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram