2026:JHHC:24338 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6038 of 2026 ----- Sharvan Kumar @ Sharvan Ray, son of Sanjay Ray, resident of village Maheshpur, PO-Dwarpahari, PS Giridih(M), District Giridih … Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Prashant Kr. Rai, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.PP …...... 04 /14.08.2026: This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 317(4)/319(2) /318(4)/338/336(3)/340(2)/61(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 66(B), 66(C) & 66(D) of the I.T Act. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail. 4. Case-diary was called for. From the case-diary, I find that mobile phone which was seized from the petitioner was having IMEI Nos. 862975067748137 and 862975067748129 and was having Airtel SIM Nos. 9875036760 and 7482081450. From page no. 11 paragraph-12 of the case-diary there are some screen shots and some evidence of cyber fraud but the same is connected with mobile nos. 9931158767 and 9552469717 which admittedly was not recovered from the possession of the petitioner. As per paragraph no. 61 the material against the petitioner is that from the Call Details Report (CDR) of the mobile of the petitioner there are details of 378 incoming calls 2026:JHHC:24338 2 and 269 outgoing calls and some SMSs. There is only one criminal antecedent against petitioner. This is the only material against the petitioner. 5. Learned Spl.PP opposes the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid materials in relation to the involvement of the petitioner and the fact that charge has already been framed, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge, Giridih in connection with Giridih (Cyber) PS Case no. 26/2025 subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be a close relative of the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 14.08.2026 Tanuj/CP-3 Uploaded on 14.08.2026