Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22913 (JHR)

RAVI KUMAR CHOURASIYA @ RAVI KUMAR @ RAVI KUMAR CHOURASIA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7626/2026 · 2026-08-14

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:24481] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7626 of 2026 ------ Ravi Kumar Chourasiya @ Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Chourasia, aged about 26 years, son of Subedar Prasad Chourasiya, resident of New Anand Nagar, Road No. 4, Ranchi, P.O. – G.P.O. Ranchi, P.S. – Sukhdeonagar, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Srikant Swaroop, Advocate Mr. Pratyush Shounikya, Advocate For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-14-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No. 218 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 331(2), 305(a) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed theft of gold and silver ornaments and cash of Rs.40,000/- from the house of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR but he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused and recovery of stolen property but Test Identification Parade of stolen property has not yet been done. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.06.2026 as mentioned in para-21 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No. 218 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 14.08.2026 Saroj/