AMBADATTA RAI ALIAS AMAR RAI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
CRLR/186/2026 · 2026-04-08
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2291 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2291 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:2508
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
CRLR/186/2026 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. A.K. Pandey,
learned counsel for the revisionist.
2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned AGA for the State.
3. Revisionist – Ambadatta Rai and his wife – Pushpa Rai are present in the Court along with their daughter – Kusum Sharma and son – Jagdish Rai.
4. Dispute in between both the parties appears to be a matrimonial one.
5. On the previous date, both the parties were directed to join the proceedings. Revisionist and his wife both are senior citizen and their son and daughter are settled and married and are residing at Haldwani. Respondent wife is also residing at Haldwani and revisionist husband is residing at Lohaghat.
6. After interaction with both the parties and with their son and daughter, it reveals that parties have settled their dispute. On interaction with the revisionist husband, he submits that he wants to live with his wife and children and similarly, wife is also agreed to live with her husband.
7. There are some minor issues in between both of them and to resolve those minor issues, daughter and son undertakes that they will settled all those issues and will also look after to both of them. Simultaneously, revisionist also undertakes that he will look after his wife and wife also submits that she will also give full regard to the revisionist husband.
8.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that since now, parties have settled their dispute amicably and have decided to live together in such an eventuality, there is no useful purpose to continue the proceeding of the instant revision.
9. In view of the settlement arrived at in between the parties in presence of their daughter and son, the instant revision is disposed of finally and the impugned order dated 03.05.2023 and order dated 24.05.2022 passed by Judge, Family Court, Haldwani, District Nainital in Misc. Criminal Case No. 25 of 2021 are set aside.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
08.04.2026. SKS