DIWAKAR SINGH @ DIVAKAR SINGH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./7733/2026 · 2026-08-18
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22903 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22903 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:24747] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.7733 of 2026
------ Diwakar Singh @ Divakar Singh, aged about 22 years, Son of Rajesh Singh, resident of Village-Dugda, Tola-Fuljhariya, P.O. & P.S. Dugda, District- Bokaro.
... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Ms. Pinki Kumari, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-18-08-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Dugda P.S. Case No. 34 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 27 and 35 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder Ravi Baks Rai. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the main allegation of firing is against Prem Singh and Abhinandan Pandey. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.06.2026 as mentioned in para- 14 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co- accused persons have been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 17.07.2026 in B.A. No. 6592 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Dugda P.S. Case No. 34 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 18.08.2026 Amar/