IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND (112) RAMKARAN AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandam directing the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the alleged threat posed by the private respondents. 2. material on record to substantiate any threat 3. for withdrawal of the present petition, with liberty to file a fresh one on the basis of cogent material and a specific threat perception. 4. merits of the case, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. 5. protect the life and liberty of its citizens in accordance with law no further order is required to be passed. June 02, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND CHANDIGARH RAMKARAN AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandam directing the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the alleged threat posed by the private respondents. A perusal of the paper book reveals that there is no cogent material on record to substantiate any threat Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition, with liberty to file a fresh one on the basis of cogent material and a specific threat perception. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. However, it is needless to say protect the life and liberty of its citizens in accordance with law no further order is required to be passed. June 02, 2026 hether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6573-2026 Date of Decision:- 02.06.2026 ……Petitioners ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the alleged threat posed by the private respondents. A perusal of the paper book reveals that there is no cogent perception to the petitioners. Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition, with liberty to file a fresh one on the basis of cogent material and a specific threat perception. e above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the say that the State is duty-bound to protect the life and liberty of its citizens in accordance with law and hence, (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 02.06.2026 ……Petitioners ……Respondents The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the us directing the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the A perusal of the paper book reveals that there is no cogent Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition, with liberty to file a fresh one on the e above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the bound to , MANJU 2026.06.02 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document