[2026:RJ-JP:11721] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3977/2026 Avtar S/o Charansingh @ Channo, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Sundarawali, Police Station Nagar, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3978/2026 Narayan @ Annu S/o Mahaveer, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Sarangpur, Police Station Nagar, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4335/2026 Vishnu @ Guddu S/o Makkhan, R/o Sundarawali, Police Station Nagar, District Deeg. (Presently Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar Mr. Aatish Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 19/03/2026 1. These misc. bail applications have been filed by the petitioners Avtar S/o Charansingh @ Channo, Narayan @ Annu [2026:RJ-JP:11721] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3977/2026] S/o Mahaveer & Vishnu @ Guddu S/o Makkhan, who were arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.309/2024 dated 16.11.2024 registered at Police Station Nagar District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 313, 317(5), 318(4), 341(2), 345(3), 61(2)(a) of B.N.S, 2023. 2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners are behind the bars since long and have falsely been implicated in the present case on the basis of statements of the co-accused persons, namely, Krishan, Radheshyam & Santosh, who have already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.12.2024. In view thereof, learned counsel submits that the case of the petitioners stands on a better footing and no recovery is required to be made from the petitioners. In such view, learned counsel for the petitioners prayed that the petitioners be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application, however, could not dispute the fact that the other co- accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by the co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.12.2024. 5. This Court, after considering the fact that other co-accused persons, despite having 4-5 pending cases have already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (i) [2026:RJ-JP:11721] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3977/2026] Avtar S/o Charansingh @ Channo, (ii) Narayan @ Annu S/o Mahaveer & (iii) Vishnu @ Guddu S/o Makkhan shall be released on bail, provided that they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so, till the completion of the trial. The petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage or misuse of liberty granted by this Court. It is made clear that the observation, as made by this Court in the bail applications, will not affect the trial of the case. 7. It is further directed that in case, the petitioners are found to be involved in any case within a period of three years from the date of passing of this order, learned Public prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J Dushyant/117-119