Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010391872021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 941/2021 Between:
1. J RAVINDRABABU, S/O. SUBBAIAH, AGED 57 YEARS, WORKING AS JUNIOR ASST., MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, PENDLIMARRI MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ ANDRURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, , PANCHAYAT RAJ ANDRURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, , ZILLA PRAJA PARISHAD, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): to declare that the action of the respondents in not promoting the applicant as Senior Asst. from the date of promotion of his immediate junior i.e. Sri K.Sivachandra in lieu of his acquittal in C.C.No.97/2013 dt 22-9-2016. Declare that applicant is entitled to be promoted as Senior Asst. from the date of promotion of his juniors i.e., Sri K. Sivachandra dt 26-11-2016 with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner:
2
1. M SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES IV
2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following order:
The petitioner originally filed O.A.No.2119 of 2017 on the file of learned Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, at Hyderabad (for short „the Tribunal‟) to declare the action of the respondents in not promoting the petitioner as Senior Assistant form the date of promotion of his immediate junior, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. After the abolition of the Tribunal, the O.A. was transferred to High Court and the same is numbered as W.P.(APAT).No.941 of 2021
3. The writ petition was listed on 13.01.2026, however, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The writ petition was directed to be listed on 13.02.2026, under the caption “for dismissal”. Even on 13.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. To give one more opportunity, the writ petition was adjourned to today. 4. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 5. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J
Dated: 20.02.2026 SNI
3
165 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION (AT) NO:941/2021
Dated: 20.02.2026 SNI