Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22889 (ORI)

ANJAN KUMAR PRADHAN v. STATE OF ODISHA

CRLMC/1586/2026 · 2026-06-30

S K Panigrahi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 1586 of 2026 Anjan Kumar Pradhan & Anr. ..…... Petitioner (s) Mr. Sthiti Pragyan Sunandini, Adv. -Versus- State of Odisha & Anr. ……. Opposite Party (s) Mr. Raj Bhusan Dash, ASC CORAM: DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI ORDER 30.06.2026 Order No. 02. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Heard. 3. The Petitioners have filed this CRLMC with a prayer to quash the criminal proceeding in Reamal P.S. Case No.127 of 2009 corresponding to C.T. No.594 of 2009 pending before the learned S.D.J.M., Deogarh. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the materials available on record, this Court finds no ground, at this stage, to interfere with the proceeding arising out of Reamal P.S. Case No.127 of 2009, corresponding to C.T. Case No.594 of 2009, pending before the learned S.D.J.M., Deogarh, as the Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 01-Jul-2026 18:15:41 Signature Not Verified p. 2 materials on record prima facie disclose the commission of the alleged offences. Accordingly, the application for quashing of the proceeding stands rejected. However, the learned trial court is directed to take all necessary steps to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible. 5. Accordingly, the CRLMC is dismissed. 6. ( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Murmu