APHC010388302008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3299] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI WRIT PETITION NO: 28473/2008 Between: 1. SMT B.VENKATANARASAMMA (DIED) AS PER L.R(SON), BODAGLA JAYA RAMAIAH S/O LAXMAIAH KOTHA MADHAVARARAM PADDAPALLY REVENUE VILLAGE SIDDAVATAM(M) CUDDAPAH DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT CHAMUNDESHWARI DEVIPETA BOGGADIVARIPALLI SIDDAVATNAM,CUDDAPAH DISTRICT 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER CUM LAND ACQUISITION, OFFICER CUDDAPAH CUDDAPAH DISTRICT CHAMUNDESHWARI DEVIPETA BOGGADIVARIPALLI SIDDAVATNAM,CUDDAPAH DISTRICT 3. THE TAHASILDAR, SIDDAVATAM(M) CUDDAPAH DISTRICT CHAMUNDESHWARI DEVIPETA BOGGADIVARIPALLI SIDDAVATNAM,CUDDAPAH DISTRICT 4. SANDALA NAGAMMA, W/O. VEERA REDDY CHAMUNDESHWARI DEVIPETA BOGGADIVARIPALLI SIDDAVATNAM,CUDDAPAH DISTRICT 5. SANDALA PRATAP REDDY, W/O. VEERA REDDY CHAMUNDESHWARI DEVIPETA BOGGADIVARIPALLI SIDDAVATNAM,CUDDAPAH DISTRICT 6. S PRASANA LAKSHMI, W/O. BRAMHANADA REDDY CHAMUNDESHWARI DEVIPETA BOGGADIVARIPALLI SIDDAVATNAM,CUDDAPAH DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner and not passing any order on the stay petition filed along with the appeal in 16/12/2008 is arbitrary unreasonable and consequently direct the respondents 1to 3 not to take steps in disburing payment of compensation exgratia for the resumption of lands of peddapally (V) Siddavatam(M) Cuddapah District to an extent of Ac 1-64 cents in Sy No.1061/1 vide DKT No.936/1408 dt 20-10-2000 to the 4th respondent herein similarly an extent of Ac 1-65 cents in Sy No.1061/2 vide DKT No.9441408 dt 20-10-2000 in favour of the 5th respodent and an extent of ac 1-65 in Sy No.1061/3 vide DKT Patta No.945/1408 dt 20-10-2000 in favour of the 6th respondent pursuant to the notices issued by the 3rd respondent vide reference No.A/266/2008 dt 30-08-2008 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 37320 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including payment of compensation exgratia payable by the respondent to 3 herein on resumption of the lands of peddapally (V) Siddavatam(M) Cuddapah District to an extent of Ac 1-64 cents in Sy No.1061/1 ac 1-65 cents in Sy No.1061/2 and ac 1.65 cents in Sy No.1061/3 pursuant to the notice of the 3rd respondent vide reference No.A/266/2008 dt 30-08-2008 pending disposal of the wp of 2008 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI WRIT PETITION NO: 28473/2008 ORDER:- Sri K.Muralidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted a letter dated 04.02.2026 to the Registrar (Judicial), Andhra Pradesh High Court, on record submitting as follows: “The above writ petition has been filed by Smt.B.Venkatanarsamma (died) as per LR Bodagala Jaya Ramaiah S/o. Laxmaiah R/o. Kotha Madhavaram, Siddavatam Mandal, Kadapa District, against the 2nd respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner and not passing any orders on the stay petition filed along with the appeal on 16/12/2008. Whereas the Mandal Revenue Officer, Siddavatam, without issuing any notice and cancelling the assignment patta certificates of writ petitioner in granting DKT patta in favor of the respondents 4 to 6 as per the orders dt. 20/10/2000. In the above matter the Hon’ble court was pleased to pass Interim orders directing the 2nd respondent to dispose of the appeal and in the meantime not to disburse the compensation amount to unofficial respondents vide its order dt. 29/12/2008. Now the petitioner herein wants to withdraw the writ petition. Therefore, at the request of petitioner filing this letter for withdrawal of the above writ petition. Therefore, I request the Hon’ble Registry to direct the office to post the W.P.No. 28473 of 2008 under the caption of “for WITHDRAWAL” before the Hon’ble court, immediately for obtaining necessary orders.” 2. No representation on either side. 3. In view of the letter dated 04.02.2026, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J Dated:06.02.2026 AG 124 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI WRIT PETITION NO: 28473/2008 Dated:06.02.2026 AG