K D IMPRESSION THROUGH ITS PROPERTIER RAJ KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/11986/2026 · 2026-05-25
Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22883 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22883 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No. 129 CWP-11986-2026 Date of decision : 25.05.2026 K. D. Impressions
.…. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Mr. Udit Bakshi, Advocate, for the petitioner (through V.C.).
* * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
(1)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition to enable the petitioner to avail remedy of appeal available to it under Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994. (2)
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
[DEEPAK SIBAL]
JUDGE
25.05.2026
[LAPITA BANERJI] shamsher
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2026.05.27 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh