Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:38926
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Review Petition No.114 of 2022
Decided on: 11th September, 2026
M/s Hari Om Enterprises
......petitioner.
Versus
Parveen Jaggi and Ors.
...Respondents
Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S.Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tejasvi Dogra, Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocates.
For the respondents: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocate General for respondents-State.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate for respondent No.6.
G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral)
Apparently, the order dated 16.12.2021, which is sought to be reviewed gives an opportunity to the petitioner, who was respondent No.12 in the writ petition, to assail the report submitted by the Committee, in accordance with law.
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2026:HHC:38926 2
2.
In view of the fact that the order under review was a short order passed in the Court on the basis of report of the Committee, which had been filed on 09.12.2021 and apparently, no objection had been filed to the same, we are of the considered opinion that the review petition is not maintainable, since the opportunity has been granted to the petitioner.
3.
Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed, so also the pending applications, if any.
( G.S. Sandhawalia )
Chief Justice
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) September 11, 2026
Judge (naveen)