Pradeep Kumar Kalidindi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/23238/2022 · 2026-01-06
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22883 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22883 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010380472022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23238/2022 Between:
1. PRADEEP KUMAR KALIDINDI, S/O.K V T SURYANARAYANA RAJU, HINDU, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O.FLAT NO. 105, SILPA AVENUE APTS, SILPA AVENUE COLONY, MIYAPUR 500 049, HYDERABAD
2. KALIDINDI LAKSHMI PARVATHI, W/O. K V T SURYANARAYANA RAJU, HINDU, AGED 63 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. 105, SILPA AVENUE APTS, SILPA AVENUE COLONY, MIYAPUR 500 049, HYDERABAD
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BLDGS, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
3. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISHA POLICE STATION, ST PAULS CHURCH, OLD BYPASS ROAD, JAMPET, RAJAMUNDRY 533101. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DISHA POLICE STATION, ST PAULS CHURCH, OLD BYPASS ROAD, JAMPET, RAJAMUNDRY
533101. 6. SATYA RAMYA SRI DATLA, D/O. SRI DATLA SATYASREE VARMA, HINDU, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O. 3-1/3, DBV RAJU TOWNSHIP, OPPOSITE FRUIT MARKET, DIWANCHERUVU, RAJANAGARAM MANDAL, ANDHRA PRADESH 533 296
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus- to declare the high handed action on the part of the respondents 3 to 5 in contemplating to settle the issues relating to
2
the movable and immovable properties of the 1st petitioner under the guise of settlement of matrimonial disputes between the 15' petitioner and 6th respondent and exerting pressure on the petitioners by calling them to DISHA P.S. Rajahmundry without there being any case registered against them as illegal, arbitrary and capricious and violative of principles of natural justice and also fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners and consequently direct the respondents not to insist the petitioner and their family members to be present before the DISHA P.S. Rajahmundry for settlement of the property disputes between the petitioner No.1 and 6th respondent in the interest of justice and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. YALLABANDI RAMATIRTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2.
Y SUDHAKAR
3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief:
“ ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the high handed action on the part of the respondents 3 to 5 in contemplating to settle the issues relating to the movable and immovable properties of the 1st petitioner under the guise of settlement of matrimonial disputes between the 15' petitioner and 6th respondent and exerting pressure on the petitioners by calling them to DISHA P.S. Rajahmundry without there being any case registered against them as illegal, arbitrary and capricious and violative of principles of natural justice and also fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners and consequently, direct the respondents not to insist the petitioner and their family members to be present before the DISHA P.S. Rajahmundry for settlement of the property disputes between the petitioner No.1 and 6th respondent in the interest of justice and to pass ...”
None represented for the Petitioners. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that it is a matrimonial dispute and based on the complaint given by respondent No.6 a case in crime No.214 of 2022 is registered by DISHA Police, Rajamahendravaram against her husband and her in-laws(petitioners herein). Respondent Police did not pressurise the parties to settle the matrimonial issues. Petitioners are called to the police Station for the purpose of family counselling and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the family disputes between the parties except under due process of law. No order as to costs. 4
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 23238 of 2022
07.01.2026
Mjl /*