Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29169 WP No. 13989 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.13989 OF 2026 (LR) BETWEEN:
1.
MRS. NIRMALA NAGARAJ W/O K. NAGARAJAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/AT NO.19 BHCS LAYOUT BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BTM 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560011.
2.
MRS. SHAMALA D.C.
W/O LATE H.D. SHESHAGIRI AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, NO.1143, 35TH 'C' CROSS, 26TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR 4TH 'T' BLOCK, BENGALURU SOUTH - 560 041.
3.
MRS. POORNIMA D.C.
W/O SHEKAR S.
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1184, 3RD CROSS, 26TH MAIN, 1ST PHASE J.P NAGAR, BENGALURU SOUTH - 560 078.
4.
MR. D.C. MAHESH S/O LATE D.C. CHANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT NO. 698, 16TH 'A' MAIN,
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29169 WP No. 13989 of 2026
38TH CROSS, JAYANAGAR 4TH 'T' BLOCK BENGALURU 560 041.
5.
MRS. INDIRA K DEVADAS W/O LATE MA DEVADAS AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/AT NO. 94, 4TH MAIN, FR 12427/2026 PROMOD LAYOUT, PANTHARAPALYA, BANGALORE SOUTH - 560 039. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANISH ACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2.
THE LAND TRIBUNAL MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU - 570 005.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY/TAHSILDAR.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU-570001.
4.
SRI. DODDEGOWDA S/O LATE SAPPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29169 WP No. 13989 of 2026
R/AT NO. NUGAHALLI VILLAGE, ILAVALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 570 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 23.02.1976 PASSED IN KLRM NO. 1472/1974-75 AT ANNEXURE -A; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners sought for withdrawal of the Writ Petition.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6