CRM-M-29741 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (135) AMAN MASIH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, 1. The petitioner is seeking quashing of order dated 29.04.2026 passed by the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tarn Taran in case arising out of FIR No.22 dated 08.03.2020 registered under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psych Sarai Amant Khan, District Tarn Taran, whereby his bail was cancelled on account of his non warrant of arrest were ordered to be issued for 01.06.2026. 2. It is absence of the petitioner on 29.04.2026 was not intentional but due to the reason that he had noted down the next date of hearing as 05.05.2026 instead of 29.04.2026. His absence before the Learned Tr intentional but was due to the reason narrated above. He is ready to join proceedings before the Learned Trial Court and to abide by the terms and 29741-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision : 25.05.2026 SIH Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking quashing of order dated 29.04.2026 passed by the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tarn Taran in case arising out of FIR No.22 dated 08.03.2020 registered under Section 21 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Sarai Amant Khan, District Tarn Taran, whereby his bail was cancelled on account of his non-appearance and bonds were forfeited to the State and warrant of arrest were ordered to be issued for 01.06.2026. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that the absence of the petitioner on 29.04.2026 was not intentional but due to the reason that he had noted down the next date of hearing as 05.05.2026 instead of 29.04.2026. His absence before the Learned Tr intentional but was due to the reason narrated above. He is ready to join proceedings before the Learned Trial Court and to abide by the terms and IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRM-M-29741-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.05.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG, Punjab The petitioner is seeking quashing of order dated 29.04.2026 passed by the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tarn Taran in case arising out of FIR No.22 dated 08.03.2020 registered under Section 21 otropic Substances Act at Police Station Sarai Amant Khan, District Tarn Taran, whereby his bail was cancelled on appearance and bonds were forfeited to the State and warrant of arrest were ordered to be issued for 01.06.2026. argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that the absence of the petitioner on 29.04.2026 was not intentional but due to the reason that he had noted down the next date of hearing as 05.05.2026 instead of 29.04.2026. His absence before the Learned Trial Court was not intentional but was due to the reason narrated above. He is ready to join proceedings before the Learned Trial Court and to abide by the terms and AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.25 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-29741 conditions to be imposed upon him. It is, therefore, argu deserves to be allowed. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Learned State counsel accepts notice of the petition on the asking of the Court and is ready to argue the matter. It is argued by learned State counsel that there is no illegality or i It is thus, stressed that the petition does not deserve to be allowed. 5. This Court has heard the rival submissions made by the parties. 6. On perusal of the order passed by the Learned Trial Court, this Court is of the in the impugned order. However, in view of the fact that the petitioner is ready to join the proceedings before the Learned Trial Court and abide by the terms and conditions to be Court, the petition is disposed of by giving direction to the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court on or before the date fixed before it and on doing so and furnishing fresh personal as well as surety bonds to the satisfaction of Learned Trial Court, he shall be admitted to bail by the Trial Court. 7. A copy of this order be sent to the Learned Trial Court. 25.05.2026 Amit Sharma 29741-2026 (O&M) (2) conditions to be imposed upon him. It is, therefore, argu deserves to be allowed. Notice of motion. Learned State counsel accepts notice of the petition on the asking of the Court and is ready to argue the matter. It is argued by learned State counsel that there is no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order. It is thus, stressed that the petition does not deserve to be allowed. This Court has heard the rival submissions made by the On perusal of the order passed by the Learned Trial Court, this Court is of the considered opinion that there is no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order. However, in view of the fact that the petitioner is ready to join the proceedings before the Learned Trial Court and abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed upon him by the Trial Court, the petition is disposed of by giving direction to the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court on or before the date fixed before it and on doing so and furnishing fresh personal as well as surety bonds to the tisfaction of Learned Trial Court, he shall be admitted to bail by the Trial A copy of this order be sent to the Learned Trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No conditions to be imposed upon him. It is, therefore, argued that the petition Learned State counsel accepts notice of the petition on the asking of the Court and is ready to argue the matter. It is argued by learned nfirmity in the impugned order. It is thus, stressed that the petition does not deserve to be allowed. This Court has heard the rival submissions made by the On perusal of the order passed by the Learned Trial Court, this considered opinion that there is no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order. However, in view of the fact that the petitioner is ready to join the proceedings before the Learned Trial Court and is ready to imposed upon him by the Trial Court, the petition is disposed of by giving direction to the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court on or before the date fixed before it and on doing so and furnishing fresh personal as well as surety bonds to the tisfaction of Learned Trial Court, he shall be admitted to bail by the Trial A copy of this order be sent to the Learned Trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.25 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.